Sample Assessments
Browse through the curated selection of our completed assessments to get a sense of the quality and depth of our work. Whether you need guidance, inspiration, or just want to evaluate our work, this page is your go-to resource.
Marijuana is one of the most intensively used employing substances from one region of the world to another. The phrase “weed” has broad connotations that does not only refer to the Pot Sativa plant but is often cultivated for its psychoactive and medical value (Calabria et al, 2010, p1).
While marijuana can contribute to general health improvements, some argue that its overuse in fact is professionally aided in several countries including Canada (Imtiaz et al, 2023) p…
Clinical directors as major medical care professionals have a responsibility to counsel and instruct people on areas that need focus guided on the benefits of strong information use. This requires the impression of patterns and selection of precautionary approaches tailored to the local setting.
It is extremely vital to monitor marijuana’s use especially to youth as it poses great public health challenges. Policy initiatives and public health approaches may help reduce the negative consequences of marijuana usage among young people (The National Academies Press, 2017, p217).
No matter the age of the user there are consequences even for marijuana use. But a particularly concerning issue is the rising prevalence of marijuana use among Canadian teenagers. According to some reports marijuana use among Canadian teenagers is actually on the rise in a few other countries (UNICEF Office of Research 2013 as cited in Canadian Social Class on Substance Abuse 2015 p. 6.
A factor that contributes to this is the more than acceptable marijuana use among adolescents which has led to the reduced acceptance of credibility among the youth. Teenagers are misled into thinking that there are more advantages to marijuana use than drawbacks (Burnett 2016 p. 423-424). A total of 18% of Canadian youths reported using marijuana in some locations in 2018 and 2019 which is significantly higher than the general rate of 5–6% among teenagers (Medicine Free Kids 2023 Abdel-Salam 2019 p. 4. 95).
People older than 25 are particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of marijuana because of the serious damage to the development of the brain. Recreational drug use during this crucial stage of development is thought to be linked to psychosomatic disorders subtle underachievement and neurocognitive deficits (Blevins et al. (2018) p. 1).
Thus the adoption of integrated preventive measures and evidence-based policies is crucial for managing these risks and improving health outcomes for adolescents. A comprehensive strategy is required to tackle the pervasive issue of cannabis use among young adults in all Canadian regions.
It is clear that marijuana is the most drug frequently associated with the admissions of Canadian teenagers to hospitals (Cure Free Kids 2023). Reducing the serious effects of cannabis use in adolescence requires raising awareness of its risks (Kaur et al. in 2022 p. 2). In order to address cannabis uses genuinely serious long-term effects this policy paper suggests updating public health regulations pertaining to teen use.
While the transient effects of pot, similar to its euphoric properties, are by and large clear, the long aftereffects of heading — particularly in teens — are often absolved (Burnett, 2016, p. 424). Canada’s Weed Act, which works with the creation, proprietorship, task, and offer of pot, was coordinated with focuses, for instance, forestalling youth access, inciting general flourishing, and lessening awful ways of behaving (Canadian Center on Substance Use and Drive, 2023).
Regardless of the lifting objectives behind this methodology, there are titanic concerns about its impact on youth. Specifically, scholastics feature three essential issues: the move in weed use among teens, the irreversible harm to the frontal cortex achieved by use before age 25, and the relationship between pot use and outrageous precious flourishing circumstances in youth (Haines-Saah and Fischer, 2021, p. 192).
One striking opening in the steady structure is the base authentic age for weed use. At the hour of underwriting, most areas set this age at 19, while Alberta and Quebec set it at 18. In 2020, Quebec raised the base authentic age to 21 to safeguard adolescents from the neurodevelopmental bets related to pot use (Nguyen and Mital, 2022, p. 2). This change lines up with recommendations from the Canadian Clinical Affiliation, which advocates for a higher authentic age cutoff and focuses on binding flourishing bets (Rubin-Kahana et al., 2022, p. 3; Nguyen and Mital, 2022, p. 6).
Research stays aware that up close and personal thriving happens into the mid-20s, with tremendous deficiency to hurt from the pot and other psychoactive substances during this period (Nguyen et al., 2020, p. 1). This proof components the requirement for approaches that raise the base veritable age for weed use to 25.
Quebec’s decision to raise the legitimate age for weed use to 21 watches out for a proactive procedure for managing diminishing pot use among young people. This approach lines up with neuroscientific proof that consolidates the consistent development of the frontal cortex during youth and early adulthood.
Responsiveness to weed during these years can achieve defeating mental, mental, and social results (Nguyen et al., 2020, p. 2). By going to near lengths, other regions could genuinely achieve essentially unclear abatements in youthful grown-up weed use.
The elective model proposed in this paper makes this far excess by raising the base genuine age for Maryjane use to 25. This approach looks out for openings in the Maryjane Act and associations’ procedures to hold adolescents back from using pot.
Raising the authentic age to 25 aligns with clear proof, ensuring that approaches are based on broad, prosperous results. This model, moreover, supplements the meaning of evasion and mischief decline through allowed planning and general thriving drives.
Rethinking the base authentic age for pot use in Canada requires a data-driven system for administering structure changes to ensure their sensibility. The Detachments in Differences (Addressed) improve the investigation of the impact of technique changes on adolescent weed use. This model dissects the connection between approach changes and results, for instance, the openness of weed and use plans (Benedetti et al., 2021, p. 3).
The Focal Clinical Officers of Sufficiency of Canada and the Metropolitan General Thriving Connection underline the meaning of approaches that limit both the interest in and availability of weed to hinder unpleasantness and mortality related to its utilization (2016, p. 13).
The proposed approach, which raises the base legitimate age to 25, lines up with these recommendations. By confining enrollment to pot during key starting stages, this approach could basically diminish the psychological and profound prosperity bets related to youthful grown-up pot use.
An exploratory blueprint could uphold the proposed approach by bringing about individuals made 25 and more settled with those made 24 and younger. This analysis would finish up whether more set-up individuals experience less broadened length horrible effects from pot use.
Nonetheless, implementing this system wouldn’t be without challenges. For example, raising the authentic age could incite expanded unlawful plans, making extra authoritative and execution challenges (Nguyen and Mital, 2022, p. 6). To conclude these issues, policymakers ought to reliably evaluate the technique’s sensibility and make changes based on the circumstance.
The proof clearly shows that pot use during energy is related to broadened length possibilities, including further likelihood of psychosis, sadness, and strain (Hosseini and Oremus, 2018, p. 305). Given the meaning of up close and personal flourishing during the years getting ready to encourage 25, progress toward that limit approval to pot during this period is critical.
While raising the base legal age for pot use to 25 could present express hardships, similar to the potential for extended unlawful blueprints, the benefits—oversaw educational, word-related, and flourishing results—far offset the obstacles. Executing this plan gives entry to Canadian spaces, including Ontario, to redesign the achievement and flourishing of their lives as young people.
Looking out for the rising rates of vivacious adult weed use requires careful repulsiveness frameworks. Raising the base genuine age to 25 is a significant push toward decreasing the shocking effects of weed on youngsters. Public thought campaigns ought to underline the long-term risks of weed use, focusing on its impact on mental well-being, individual prosperity, and mental functioning.
Clinical guards and clinical idea providers can expect to play a fundamental role in scattering this information and facilitating informed choice creation among young people and their families.
Despite clinical ideas, professionals and instructors ought to be ready to enlighten students about the dangers related to pot use. Schools provide an ideal setting for surrendering proof and preparing with veneration for this subject. Policymakers should zero in on research to help these undertakings; it is both sound solid areas for and ensures suspicion methodologies.
The venture between researchers, clinical idea providers, teachers, and policymakers is crucial for making assumptions that defend young people and lessen weed-related harm. By embracing evidence-based approaches, Canada can create an unmatched future for its young people while keeping an eye out for the general thriving challenges introduced by weed use (Beirness and Porath, 2022, p. 5).
Abdel-Salam, O. M. E. (2019). The wickedness of weed in adolescents. Biomedical and
Pharmacology Journal, 12(2), 495-498. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1667
Beirness, D. J., and Porath, A. J. (2022). Clearing the partake in on dope: Pot use and
Driving. Canadian Center on Substance Use and Proclivity.
https://www.ccsa.ca/objections/default/records/2022-12/CCSA-Weed Use-Driving-Report-
2022-en.pdf
Benedetti, E., Resce, G., Brunori, P., and Molinaro, S. (2021). Weed approach changes and
Adolescent pot use: Proof from Europe. All things considered, the Journal of Ordinary.
All orders at our writing service are delivered exceptionally for research purposes.
