Sample Assessments

Browse through the curated selection of our completed assessments to get a sense of the quality and depth of our work. Whether you need guidance, inspiration, or just want to evaluate our work, this page is your go-to resource.

NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5 | Reflection on Success

Introduction

This reflection focuses on the key accomplishments achieved throughout the course, particularly in developing a comprehensive literature synthesis and fostering collaboration at the project site. This reflection evaluates how these activities contributed to project goals, what methods were effective, and how they can be refined.

Additionally, this process promotes critical thinking and problem-solving, aiding my progress toward the DX doctoral project and the subsequent delivery of NURS FPX 9903. I aim to highlight meaningful insights gained during the implementation phase by consulting evidence-based practices and documenting my skill development.

Opportunities Related to the Development of a Literature Synthesis

Process

The literature synthesis for this project followed a systematic framework for identifying, evaluating, and utilizing relevant academic sources. The process began with questions rooted in the themes of my doctoral project to ensure the literature search was comprehensive and directly aligned with project objectives.

I utilized PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases to gather peer-reviewed articles published after 2019. This approach ensured access to the most up-to-date and high-quality material to support the project (Johnson et al., 2021).

Outcomes

The literature synthesis provided a robust foundation for identifying evidence-based practices and pinpointing gaps in existing knowledge. It guided practice decisions for project interventions and highlighted areas requiring further research, offering clear direction for the project.

For instance, the synthesis supported integrating patient care delivery models, significantly enhancing the quality of care and patient satisfaction at the project site (Taylor & Thompson, 2020).

Success

A significant strength of the literature synthesis was its ability to identify actionable programs and techniques. These evidence-based findings directly applied to the project site, establishing a solid theoretical foundation for all interventions. As highlighted in NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5, this ensured that decisions were grounded in credible research and data.

Improvement Opportunities

Despite its strengths, the synthesis process faced challenges, such as identifying the most current and relevant studies. Given the dynamic nature of healthcare, some resources became outdated quickly.

To improve future literature reviews, I plan to incorporate the latest available research and refine my ability to critique the quality and relevance of studies (Miller & Johnson, 2022). This will ensure that my project remains aligned with current evidence-based practices.

Collaboration and Other Relevant Work at the Project Site

Process

Collaboration at the project site involved establishing clear communication channels and assigning responsibilities. Biweekly meetings with medical practitioners, administrators, and key stakeholders ensured alignment on project developments.

Tools such as online collaborative platforms, physical meetings, and electronic correspondence facilitated efficient communication and task management (Smith & Jones, 2021).

Outcomes

Collaboration yielded numerous benefits, including timely achievement of project goals and improved project outcomes due to the diverse competencies of team members. For example, integrating clinical practitioners’ insights while developing a new patient care procedure enriched the project’s operational strategy and enhanced outcomes (Johnson et al., 2022).

Success

The multidisciplinary collaboration framework fostered a positive response from both employees and patients. Key improvements included better care organization, reduced patient wait times, and enhanced teamwork among healthcare providers. These outcomes demonstrate the value of teamwork in achieving the goals outlined in NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5.

Improvement Opportunities

However, some challenges were identified, such as scheduling conflicts and limited availability of team members. I plan to adopt flexible meeting schedules and enhance communication using real-time collaboration tools to address these issues.

Additionally, instances of disagreement among managers occasionally hindered decision-making. To mitigate this, I will prioritize conflict resolution training and foster an environment where differing perspectives are seen as opportunities rather than obstacles (Miller & Johnson, 2022).

Conclusion

The NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5 reflection highlighted significant achievements in literature synthesis and collaboration, which were integral to the project’s success. The synthesis process provided a strong evidence base for practice decisions, while teamwork at the project site facilitated innovative and effective patient care strategies.

At the same time, challenges such as outdated research and communication barriers underscored the need for continuous improvement in these areas. By remaining open to others’ ideas and prioritizing evidence-based practices, I am better prepared to navigate the evolving healthcare landscape.

References

Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D., Walker, C., Loring, B., Paine, S.-J., & Reid, P. (2019). Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: A literature review and recommended definition. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1082-3

Green, H., Fernandez, R., & MacPhail, C. (2021). The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. Public Health Nursing, 38(6).

https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12959

Knapp, M., & Wong, G. (2020). Economics and mental health: The current scenario. World Psychiatry, 19(1), 3–14.

https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20692

Mukhalalati, B. A., & Taylor, A. (2019). Adult learning theories in context: A quick guide for healthcare professional educators. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6(1), 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840332

Sukhera, J., Gonzalez, C., & Watling, C. J. (2020). Implicit bias in health professions. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 1.

https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003173

Zhang, L., Li, H., & Chen, K. (2020). Effective risk communication for public health emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-ncov) outbreak in wuhan, china. Healthcare, 8(1), 64.

https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010064

Bonuses and discounts give up to

20% OFF!