Sample Assessments
Browse through the curated selection of our completed assessments to get a sense of the quality and depth of our work. Whether you need guidance, inspiration, or just want to evaluate our work, this page is your go-to resource.
The healthcare business is constantly changing and advancing. To stay aware of the change, healthcare organizations should use and retain strong leadership. Leadership should be knowledgeable of regulations and the regulating agencies that impact the advancement of the organization. Viable leaders are critical for strengthening the quality and integration of care (Sfantou, et al., 2017).
All through the long term, healthcare has transformed into a value-streamed industry with the patient experience transforming into an important factor in the advancement of the organization. Patient satisfaction is a higher priority than ever with medical expenses and insurance charges rising and consumers finding a greater financial gamble associated with their care (NRC Health, 2017). Patients are turning out to be increasingly engaged with their care and are searching for the best health care they can find. Healthcare leadership should have a business mentality to rival the other organizations around them. Patients are searching for the best care, at the best cost, with the best experience.
They not only want to be satisfied with the treatment they get but also with the overall environment where the care is gotten. The patient’s experience can have a serious impact on the reputation of the healthcare organization. Individuals who have a negative experience at a particular business are not prone to return. This cause and impact also apply to the healthcare business. Right now that patients have a significantly engaged, positive experience with their hospital, it’s a mutually beneficial arrangement (NRC Health, 2017).
They will usually return and will educate others concerning their experiences, whether by overhearing individuals’ conversations or with patient satisfaction audits. Healthcare organizations that are rated exceptionally by their discharged patients are also rated significantly by the general public (NRC Health, 2017). Leadership has to see the importance of patients’ experiences and the negative and beneficial outcomes it has on the advancement of the organization. Leadership can make or break the organization as the main impetus causes change (Woods, 2016).
The healthcare leaders are responsible for the decisions that lead to the achievement or failure of an organization. An organization that brilliantly lights on procedural greatness anyway the service quality falls to a fair level will see a consequence of unremarkable patient experiences. This can cause financial strain and even threaten an organizational shutdown (Woods, 2017). Senior leaders should consider and make progress toward quality and safe experiences given by their healthcare organization.
Since repayment models are significantly affected by patient satisfaction, leadership really should be exceptionally associated with the overall patient experience. Positive patient experiences cause further created results with higher satisfaction rates, and greater repayment for services.
As emphasized in BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Health Care Industry, patient satisfaction is a primary focus in healthcare. If satisfaction rates decline, the organization’s outcomes will suffer unless improvement plans are implemented. While patient satisfaction is relatively straightforward to measure, dissatisfaction can be more challenging to quantify. Six domains are used to evaluate dissatisfaction: inadequacy, slight, prolonged waits, ineffectual communication, lack of environmental control, and substandard amenities (Lee, et al., 2010). These factors underscore the critical role of leadership in addressing and improving patient experiences.
Inadequacy would be the place where a provider is unaware of the reasoning or treatments that have already been performed on a patient. An example of impoliteness would be a lack of bedside manner. Assuming staff individuals are inconsiderate or condescending to patients. Prolonged wait times are probably one of the most common patient complaints.
This incorporates waiting to be seen, yet additionally waiting to be assisted. Patients waiting for assistance to utilize the bathroom or have a dressing changed can be not exactly satisfactory. Communication issues are also a common factor in satisfaction ratings. Providers should pass information to patients so they have a realistic expectation of the care and treatment.
Another area of dissatisfaction is the lack of environmental control. Patients want a safe and calming environment to heal. Paying attention to uproarious staff individuals or being awakened on various occasions for unnecessary strategies can achieve dissatisfaction and even unfortunate results.
Lastly, having substandard amenities can cause patient dissatisfaction. Patients expect certain degrees of solace like televisions in rooms and advanced medical treatment options. All of these domains should be addressed and enhanced or patient satisfaction can persist. Low patient satisfaction causes a lack of repayment and a lack of return patients to the facility. Endeavors to address and manage these center expectations of hospital care will assist decrease patient dissatisfaction with hospitalization and work on the conveyance of quality hospital care (Lee, et al., 2010).
An advanced service line is a recognizable, coordinated collection of healthcare services giving patients a central access feature that looks for seamless treatment across various disciplines, care destinations, care providers, and time (Phillips, et al., 2015). This model has been demonstrated to assist hospitals with pushing toward conveying predominant grade, practical, and value-based services in a variety of clinical areas (Phillips, et al., 2015). Service lines should be a one-stop for patients.
Various services ought to be associated with one setting to get patients far from being expected to search for healthcare. This can be a challenge for patients as they probably won’t have the option to find several particular aspects of healthcare required. Regardless, by including several extraordinary services under one rooftop, patients don’t have to search for their particular needs. All that is required is in one place, which makes access easier and further creates results. Separating themselves into particular service lines, providers can aim to attract commercial insurance contracts and lift volumes and wages.
Traditional, or storage facility-situated approaches to healthcare are uncoordinated lines of healthcare. Patients are treated starting with one provider and then onto the accompanying with almost no communication between the providers or facilities to which their care is transferred. For example, a dialysis patient searches for dialysis care, however, there is a lack of communication between the dialysis place and her primary care physician.
The patient regularly ingests unfortunate dietary components that lead to an increase in liquid create, which will probably lead the patient to be admitted to the hospital. Drugs are then changed and the patient is discharged, yet no information is shared with the primary care provider. This patient would face a perpetual pattern of this course of treatment, which could never get to a more elevated level. This kind of siloed care takes a colossal cost to the health of patients, families, caregivers, and the local area. It can also lead to significant expenses for the patients and the healthcare frameworks.
In the long term, many hospitals and health frameworks have adopted the dyad concept to create management teams that consist of a clinical part gotten together with an administrative part (Chazal and Montgomery, 2017). Pairing clinical and administrative positions can give a larger amount of information to the healthcare model. Administrative individuals don’t always have the clinical information to drive an organization, and clinical individuals typically don’t have the business standpoint to push an organization’s administrative goal. Each dyad partner gets a particular mastery of the clinical and business operations to not permanently establish to leverage each other’s assets to advance organization capability and ultimately work on general health (Chazal and Montgomery, 2017).
The dyad model has been influential in creating a collaborative culture in the healthcare business. Clinically, the physician leader is responsible for guaranteeing quality, verification-based care, and confining variations and gaps in care (Chazal and Montgomery, 2017). Financial and production network management, market share analysis, and capital planning and sending are among the Responsibilities of the administrative leader (Chazal and Montgomery, 2017).
This cultural shift has contrasted from past models in which administrators made clinical cycle decisions without consulting with providers, or clinicians making unfortunate business decisions without consulting business management professionals inside the health framework. The cultural shift that accompanies the dyad model can work on patient results and work on the quality and safety of healthcare and the interaction inside the organization.
Similar to other business components, employee/manager and provider relations are critical to the advancement of an organization. Although it has been one of the several areas in which occupations have been created, working conditions of health laborers have declined. This incorporates frozen wages, reduction in personnel, work overload, increased staff turnover, decreased status, and diminished work expectations (Yepes-Baldo, et al., 2016). Employees should feel connected to their organization and regarded by providers and individual staff individuals. This further creates the health and safety of patients and the organization.
Specializing in several service lines allows hospitals to work in select areas and appreciate economies of mastery and scale. To make a service line supportive, many assistance functions should be seen and set up. Particularly like any cycle, the assistance functions are what keep improvement in a positive direction. Full implementation of a service-line approach requires changes inside the organization structure, motivator plans, physician relationships, and business improvement.
Health frameworks should have a clear understanding of the patient environment, the general environment, and the economics of healthcare and the competition. Culture plays a large part in service line implementation. Business improvement and IT strategies, and advancing a culture of health, quality, and safety are all critical factors. Changing the way staff and Patients view healthcare as a bothersome task, yet they will assist with creating service lines inside a health framework and keep them moving in a positive direction.
Targeting the patient’s necessities and inclinations has transformed into an important contributor to further creating care conveyance, achieving better clinical results, and enhancing patient satisfaction (Hijazi, et al., 2018). Quality management practices have a significant impact on patient care. Healthcare leaders play a significant work in quality management practices. Studies have demonstrated the way that the leadership’s vision can play a primary work in supporting an organization’s obligation to deal with the quality of patient experience and create the right conditions and circumstances for an organization to succeed (Hijazi, et al., 2018).
Leadership ought to encourage and engage staff individuals to put patients first. This means that the way of life should be changed and new service line initiatives should be seen. It is important to realize the value of moving the focal reason behind accommodating physicians to place the patient as the main priority (Hijazi, et al., 2018).
Quality leadership sees the value of change for advancement results. Therefore, leaders anticipate change and respond to it accordingly to allow the organization to continue to create by investigating groundbreaking ideas (IvyPanda, 2019). Leaders ought to encourage strategic planning, collaboration and teamwork among all team individuals. Quality leadership is the foundation for regular management innovation and creativity in many organizations (IvyPanda, 2019).
Leadership Adjusting allows ranking chiefs the chance to connect with front-line staff to examine patient safety concerns and generate ideas to continue quality improvement (Vanderscheuren, 2019). This cycle also allows leadership to have an immediate perspective on issues faced by their staff individuals. Leadership Adjusting fabricates trust and accountability, further creates communication, gives everyone a really necessary lift, and supports staff recognition (Vanderscheuren, 2019).
Rather than Reading a report or prevention gives a significant understanding of what works and what doesn’t work for the organization. It adds a sensation of collaboration and teamwork among staff individuals. There is certainly no viable replacement for the experiences and mastery of individuals who are actually in the field and accomplishing the work. Leadership Adjusting is an essential feature of any patient safety culture and is maintained by almost every major patient safety organization (Vanderscheuren, 2019).
As discussed in BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Health Care Industry, leadership is essential for all organizations and determines whether a company or organization succeeds in achieving its goals and targets, or fails to do so (IvyPanda, 2019). Healthcare leadership plays a unique role in ensuring quality patient care while motivating healthcare providers to deliver excellent services. It is crucial to establish the most efficient, cost-effective, and safest way to provide care to patients.
Leaders are also responsible for fostering a positive patient experience. This not only influences patient outcomes but also encourages patients to return for services. Patients who are satisfied with their healthcare experience are more likely to return and not seek other providers. Similar to other business models, a satisfied client will typically come back for future services and offerings.
Chazal, R. A. & Montgomery, M. J. (2017). The Dyad Model and Value-Based Care. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69(10), 1353-1354.
Hijazi, H. H., Harvey, H. L., Alyahya, M.S., Alshraideh, H. A., Al Abdi, R. M. & Parahoo, S. K. (2018). The Impact of Applying Quality Management Practices on Patient Centeredness in Jordanian Public Hospitals: Results of Predictive Modeling. Human Understanding. Retrieved from https://nrchealth.com/impactimprovedpatientexperiences/#:~:text=Better%20 patient%20 experiences%2C%20which%20 involves,in%20their%20 own%20health%20 outcomes.
IvyPanda. (2019). Leadership in Quality Management. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/leadership-in-quality-management/
Lee, A. V., Moriarty, J. P., Borgstrom, C. & Horwitz L. I. (2010). What can we learn from patient dissatisfaction? Analysis of dissatisfying events at an academic medical center. Journal of hospital medicine, 5(9), 514-520. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3075540/
NRC Health (2017). The Impact of Improved Patient Experiences. Retrieved from https://nrchealth.com/impactimprovedpatientexperiences/#:~:text=Better%20 patient%20 experiences%2C%20which%20 involved,in%20their%20 own%20health%20 outcomes.
Sfantou, D. F., Laliotis, A., Patelarou, A. E., Sifaki-Pistolla, D., Matalliotakis, M. & Patelarou, E. (2017). Important of Leadership Style towards Quality of Care Measures in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review. Healthcare, 5(4), 73. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746707/pdf/healthcare-05-00073.pdf
Vanderscheuren, A. (2019). Employee Engagement and Leadership Rounding. TheBerylInstitute.Retrieved from https://www.theberylinstitute.org/blogpost/947424/315036/Employee-Engagement-and-Leadership-Rounding
Woods, C. (2016). The Role of Leadership in Patient Experience. Retrieved from https://languageofcaring.org/blogpost/roleofleadershipinpatientexperience/#:~:text=Patients%20 deserve%20the%20best%20 and,patient%20 experience%20across%20the%20 continuum.
Yepes-Baldo, M., Romeo, M. & Berger, R. (2016). Relationship of health workers with their organization and work: A cross-cultural study. Revista de saude publica, 50(18). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902091/
All orders at our writing service are delivered exceptionally for research purposes.
