Sample Assessments
Browse through the curated selection of our completed assessments to get a sense of the quality and depth of our work. Whether you need guidance, inspiration, or just want to evaluate our work, this page is your go-to resource.
Nursing plays a vital role in ensuring the quality of healthcare, influenced by several factors, including the competence of the nurse and the environment in which they work. A skilled nurse understands the expected health outcomes of the patient population they serve, but their effectiveness can be further enhanced by a supportive and well-structured work environment.
For this paper, I selected the article “Lower Mortality in Magnet Hospitals,” published in Medical Care in May 2013. This study examines the differences in mortality rates and failure-to-rescue rates among post-surgical patients in 56 Magnet hospitals compared to 508 non-Magnet hospitals, assessing the impact of nursing on patient outcomes. The research builds on a similar study conducted in 1994, providing updated insights into the relationship between nursing excellence and hospital performance.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences in mortality rates between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals and to analyze how nursing contributes to these results.
Since 1994, the criteria for Magnet designation have evolved, transitioning from a basic certification process to a comprehensive evaluation. The number of Magnet-recognized hospitals has increased tenfold, yet less than ten percent of U.S. hospitals have earned this designation. Achieving Magnet status requires hospitals to undergo on-site evaluations and demonstrate excellence in various areas, including:
Hospitals that receive Magnet status must also reapply every four years, ensuring continuous adherence to high standards.
The study reviewed hospital data from four states with large populations, covering the years 2006-2007. It focused on 30-day mortality rates and failure-to-rescue rates in post-surgical patients aged 21-85 who remained in the hospital and did not leave against medical advice. A survey of over 100,000 nurses working in these states was also conducted. The nursing workforce data was gathered from state nurse registries, and nurses were asked about their work environment, education levels, and place of employment.
By linking hospital outcome data with nurse survey results, the researchers aimed to determine whether Magnet hospitals exhibited stronger nursing organization and performance compared to non-Magnet hospitals.
The study found that Magnet hospitals tend to have more beds, often functioning as teaching institutions and non-profit facilities. These factors increase the likelihood of adopting new medical innovations and employing nurses with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) or higher degrees. While the article acknowledges that some hospitals may have already excelled in nursing care before achieving Magnet designation, the results still highlight notable advantages in Magnet facilities.
The findings revealed that Magnet hospitals had lower inpatient mortality and failure-to-rescue rates compared to non-Magnet hospitals. Additionally, nurses working in Magnet-designated hospitals reported better working conditions and greater overall job satisfaction.
The article effectively illustrates the differences between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals using statistical data to support its findings. The analysis of hospital mortality rates and nursing outcomes is detailed, though some of the statistical evaluation methods were complex and challenging to interpret. However, the overall message of the study is clear: while Magnet designation itself may not be the sole factor influencing patient outcomes, high-quality nursing care remains essential in achieving better health results.
All orders at our writing service are delivered exceptionally for research purposes.