Browse through the curated selection of our completed assessments to get a sense of the quality and depth of our work. Whether you need guidance, inspiration, or just want to evaluate our work, this page is your go-to resource.
The paper is relevant to the analysis of the case related to the “General Dynamics”. General Dynamics has selected the agile framework in their project. The project of the General Dynamics is based on Combat Identification Server (CLDD). The paper is based on the analysis of the General Dynamics case in the context of the CLDS project in the defense sector (Dadd et al, 1996). First of all, the reason for choosing an agile framework will be discussed. Secondly, the major business problems relevant to the project management will be discussed along with the major techniques applied by the team to deliver the project of high quality, on time and on budget. The rationale will be provided to ensure the effectiveness of the project management approach utilized by the company. the manner in which the agile methodology is been learned by the coaches master and the teams to resolve the business problems. The approaches will be discussed that would be most effective in this regard. The comparison will be made about the business benefits attain from the agile approach as compared to the traditional project management approach. In the end, the opinion will be given to the coach to manage the project in a better way for the success of the project.
The prominent reason for using the agile framework at General Dynamics are to overcome the issues of project management traditional approach. The traditional approaches were too slow. These were also not transparent and failed to provide the high-quality work due to dispersed team efforts. In this way, the business was not able to attain authentic business solutions. Another prominent reason for selecting the agile framework is to overcome the issues facing by the organization related to a speed of project work performance. The previous approach such Rapid Application Development (RAD) may provide the speedy work and quick fixes but unable to focus on the quality. Less space is available for improving the required areas. The agile framework provides an effective approach to overcome the issues related to traditional approach and RAD approach and provide bets combination of solutions in term of quality, control, business involvement, good communication, and transparency.
The major problems facing by the General Dynamics project tea is the difficulty in managing the time and cost constraints of the project. The organizations such as General Dynamics is involved in complex technology processes such as the Combat Identification Server (CLDS) Technology Demonstrator Project (TDP). CLDS is a complex technology and using this complex technology in the military project along with ensuring the time and cost objective is a big challenge for the company. The project team at General Dynamics is trying to overcome these issues by adopting the agile framework using Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) (Kovse & Härder, 2005). Managing the time and cost constraints in the complex military project is a challenging process and the project team is trying to solve this issue. A quality constraint is another issue of concern. Because the fast delivery of project outcomes within limited cost may be called for unsatisfied quality. Quality compromise is unbearable in military projects. Hence, this issue needs to be overcome.
The project team has applied the agile project management technique in term of applying the Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) to ensure the good quality work and deliver the project outcomes on time and within specified budget limits. DSDM approach is a complex one but effective to ensure the timely and quality delivery of the work. The project team has adopted the DSDM approach in the technically advanced manner in order to deliver the timely solution of the complex issues. The project team was comprised of Tactical Data links Delivery Team’s (TDL DT). The team was dedicated to providing a technologically advanced solution which would also appropriate in term of the current economic situation.
DSDM approach is identified as an effective method to provide technologically advanced and appropriate solution for the General Dynamics. DSDM is a forefront of the solution delivery based on scalable agile projects. DSDM is an effective approach in providing an agile framework which will be effective equally for the large and complex organizational projects just like CLDS or some small straightforward solution. DSDM is not only effective to provide development and software related IT solutions but equally appropriate for providing a non-IT solution. DSDM is also called “mature agile” approach as it provides the strong base to the 21st-century corporate projects such as General Dynamics. I completely agree with the DSDM approach to be implemented in General Dynamics as it a wider concept of Agile and help for Agile software development and fully adopted the value for the Manifesto of software development.
The leaders and project team master the agile methodology to resolve the issue of General Dynamics business problem. The team uses the methods to develop the software in the most effective way which can provide value to the whole organization. The interactions of the individuals over the tools and processes are highly required to accomplish the goals of the project. To master the agile methodology, the project team need to collaborate with everyone (Stapleton, 1999). The process and tools are relatively less important in the context of an agile project framework. In the agile framework, the team will not provide the tasks but just need to provide some guidance to support the project. In this way, the team will be in the best place to understand the project needs and work in the best possible way. DSDM provide a torchlight to guide the coach and team roles and responsibilities.
The three approaches that are most effective include working software over comprehensive documentation, respond to change over following of plan and customers collaboration. The first approach of the agile framework is the working software and comprehensive documentation approach. It includes the ability to perform the work for high-level versions and ensure collaborative techniques to provide the right solution. Along with this, the timely documentation is effective to support the solution (Wang, Zhao, Wang & Sun, 2014).
The second approach is customer collaboration and contracts negotiations. Agile projects focus on collaboration and the project contracts reflect them. DSDM elaborate the prioritized requirements in the contract to meet the project scope and ensure the solution development with the customer’s collaboration (Hoda, Noble & Marshall, 2011).
The third approach is to respond to the change while following the plan. DSDM approach enables the project to meet the flexible business needs. change is one of a successful outcome using DSDM approach.
The agile approach method is more beneficial and productive as compared to the traditional method of project management. Waterfall Model is a traditional method which is not an iterative method. The traditional method can be more effective mostly during the process stage. Comparatively, the agile approach such as sequential model goes through different stages such as requirement analysis, process design, testing, implementation, and maintenance. Both approaches are effective to create value proposition but the agile approach is beneficial to provide benefits at the beginning of the process in the form of delivering high adaptability, visibility, and value which reduce the project related risks. In the agile approach, user involvement is encouraged and promoted transparency and visibility. The continuous planning and feedback during each phase of the project are effective to deliver value to the business.
The coach plays a significant role in an agile project. The term agile coach is representing the role very clearly. Agile coach provides the support to the project team and improves the methodology to perform work in the project. The agile coach provides the support to the team and encourages them to rethink about the process in the way to encourage the development. The coach also plays the role of trainer and advisor. The coach uses to conduct formal and informal training sessions. On-site coach put their training into action to make other team members train about the project processes. The coach should also act as a change agent in order to improve the process progress under the light of continuous feedback. The coach may help the team to motivate to achieve the agile vision (Ghobadi, et al., 2016). The role of coach is critical for project success because coach help to collaborate the efforts of team.
The project of General Dynamics is a Technology Demonstrator Project (TDP). The basic purpose of this project is to enhance the utilization of technology in the military. The agile framework based on DSDM is effective and more benefited as compared to the traditional approach to provide the outcomes of the positive project.
Dadd, G. J., Sutton, A. E., & Greig, A. W. M. (1996, June). Multivariable control of military engines. In AGARD Conf. Proc. no. 572̵Advanced Aero-Engine Concepts and Controls.
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2011). The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing Agile teams. Information and Software Technology, 53(5), 521-534.
Ghobadi, M., Mahajan, R., Phanishayee, A., Devanur, N., Kulkarni, J., Ranade, G., … & Kilper, D. (2016, August). Projector: Agile reconfigurable data center interconnect. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference (pp. 216-229). ACM.
Kovse, J., & Härder, T. (2005). Model-driven development of versioning systems: An evaluation of different approaches. Technical report, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Tech. Rep.
Stapleton, J. (1999, June). DSDM: Dynamic systems development method. In Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, 1999. Proceedings of (pp. 406-406). IEEE.
Wang, X., Zhao, L., Wang, Y., & Sun, J. (2014). The role of requirements engineering practices in agile development: an empirical study. In Requirements Engineering (pp. 195-209). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
All orders at our writing service are delivered exceptionally for research purposes.
